Garlich Printing Company v. Kettler et al
| Garlich Printing Company |
| Michael Kettler and World Press, Inc. |
| 4:2020cv01910 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re #25 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri filed by Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company. (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 26 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #25 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri filed by Defendants Michael Kettler, World Press, Inc.. (Foster, James) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri by Defendants Michael Kettler, World Press, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(Foster, James) |
Filing 24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion to stay briefing on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. ECF No. #23 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than 14 days after this Court determines whether this action will be remanded, Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/14/2021. (AFO)
|
| Filing 23 MOTION to Stay re #15 MOTION to Dismiss :Defendant Kettler's Counterclaim by Defendant Michael Kettler. (O'Neal, Brian) |
| Filing 22 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant World Press, Inc.. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (O'Neal, Brian) |
| Filing 21 ENTRY of Appearance by James N. Foster, Jr for Counter Claimant Michael Kettler, Defendants Michael Kettler, World Press, Inc.. (Foster, James) |
| Filing 20 ENTRY of Appearance by Kevin J. Lorenz for Counter Claimant Michael Kettler, Defendants Michael Kettler, World Press, Inc.. (Lorenz, Kevin) |
| Filing 19 ENTRY of Appearance by Brian M. O'Neal for Counter Claimant Michael Kettler, Defendants Michael Kettler, World Press, Inc.. (O'Neal, Brian) |
Filing 18
ORDER CONCERNING REMOVAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than seven days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a memorandum in support of its notice of removal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file a response no later than seven days after the memorandum is filed. No further briefing will be permitted. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/8/2021. (AFO)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company, Counter Defendant Garlich Printing Company Sent To: State Court - Executed (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #15 MOTION to Dismiss :Defendant Kettler's Counterclaim filed by Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company, Counter Defendant Garlich Printing Company. (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss :Defendant Kettler's Counterclaim by Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company, Counter Defendant Garlich Printing Company. (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Michael Kettler, World Press, Inc..(BAK) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Strike filed by Defendants Michael Kettler, World Press, Inc.. (BAK) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Strike by Defendants Michael Kettler, World Press, Inc.. (BAK) |
| Filing 11 COUNTERCLAIM against plaintiff Garlich Printing Company, filed by Michael Kettler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(BAK) |
Filing 10
ORDER denying #8 Motion for TRO (BAK)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Defendant Michael Kettler. (BAK) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(BAK) |
| Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Garlich Printing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(BAK) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Brian E. McGovern for Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company. (McGovern, Brian) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Anthony W. Hafner for Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company. (Hafner, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company Sent To: State Court - Unexecuted (Kaemmerer, Bryan) Modified on 12/31/2020 (BAK). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company Sent to Defendants Sent To: Plaintiff (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Garlich Printing Company. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 20SL-CC04797, with receipt number AMOEDC-8376016, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Garlich Printing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form)(Kaemmerer, Bryan) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.