Hagg v. Tubbesing
Brian G. Hogg and Brian G. Hagg |
Tara Tubbesing |
4:2021cv00040 |
January 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Shirley Padmore Mensah |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal, filed by Brian G. Hagg Regarding: The appellant has failed to pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court the requisite docketing fees or to apply for in forma pauperis status as directed. Accordingly, appellant is directed to show cause, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Eighth Circuit Rule 3C. USCA Appeal #: 21-1216 (MCB) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order (Docket No. #12 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/5/2021. (KXS) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 14. Fri Feb 5 15:13:44 CST 2021 (Spurgeon, Katherine) |
Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT to #12 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Brian G. Hagg. (KXS) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Brian G. Hagg. (EAB) |
Filing 11 ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal, filed by Brian G. Hagg Regarding: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, CDs, videos, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. USCA Appeal #: 21-1216 (AAT) |
Filing 10 ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal, filed by Brian G. Hagg Regarding: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by February 19, 2021, an order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. USCA Appeal #: 21-1216 (AAT) |
Filing 9 Initial Notification from USCA for #7 Notice of Appeal, filed by Brian G. Hagg USCA Appeal Number: 21-1216(AAT) |
Filing 8 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding #6 Order of Transfer to Other District,. Notice of Appeal filed on 1/25/21 by Petitioner Brian G. Hagg. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JWD) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order of Transfer to Other District by Petitioner Brian G. Hagg. Note: plaintiff's name changed from Hogg to Hagg in CM/ECF pursuant to the notation contained in the notice of appeal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(KXS) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER TO OTHER DISTRICT to:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. See 28 U.S.C. 2241(d).( Case to be transferred after 2/4/2021.). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/21/2021. (AAT) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Thu Jan 21 15:27:08 CST 2021 (Thompson, Alicia) |
Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION For Temporary Restraining Order & Request For A District Court of Three Judges For A Preliminary Injunction by Petitioner Brian G. Hogg. (AAT) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL -Petition for Redress of Grievances - re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Brian G. Hogg. (AAT) |
Judge Mensah enters a Standing Order in all of her cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/shirley-padmore-mensah (EAB) |
Filing 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. (JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Jan 11 13:01:42 CST 2021 (admin,) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Brian G. Hogg. (JWD) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Brian G. Hogg. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents - Missouri Constitution, #2 Supplemental - Petition for Redress of Grievances, #3 Envelope)(JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.