Enos v. Saul
| Tracy Enos |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 4:2021cv00050 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Tracy Enos. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 2/3/2021 by serving Social Security Administration. (MCB)
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Tracy Enos. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 2/3/2021 by serving United States Attorney General. (MCB)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Tracy Enos. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 2/2/2021 by serving Sayler Fleming, U.S. Attorney, answer due 4/5/2021. (MCB)
|
|
Filing 9
FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Tracy Enos, Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (AAT)
|
|
Filing 8
ENTRY of Appearance by Jane Rund for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Rund, Jane)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons was hand delivered to USMS this date. (MCB)
|
|
Filing 6
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (See CMO for complete details.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case has been assigned to Track 4. This case has been randomly assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have twenty-one (21) days from their entry of appearance to file their Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction forms. Pursuant to 12(a)(3) and (4), Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant must file any motion to dismiss, motion to remand, and/or answer within sixty (60) days of service of plaintiff's complaint. Along with its answer defendant shall file a transcript of the record, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on January 14, 2021. (MCB)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on January 14, 2021. (MCB)
|
|
Filing 4
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ)
|
|
Filing 3
FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Plaintiff Tracy Enos. (BAK)
|
|
Filing 2
First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Tracy Enos. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit CJA 23)(Van Fossan, Kristen)
|
|
Filing 1
Social Security COMPLAINT Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - Yes,, filed by Tracy Enos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Commissioner of Social Security, #4 Summons US Attorney General, #5 Summons US Attorney)(Van Fossan, Kristen)
|
|
Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
