Thompson et al v. General Motors LLC et al
Weibin Lam and Nancy Thompson |
Michael Hunter, General Motors LLC, Joe-K Used Cars, LLC, Estate of Nikita Thompson and Nikita Thompson |
4:2021cv00183 |
February 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court Plaintiffs Weibin Lam and Nancy Thompson's Motion to Remand and Memorandum in Support to state court Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiffs Weibin Lam, Nancy Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Initial Williams State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit 2 - Settlement Offer, #3 Exhibit 3 - Letter Enclosing Settlement Agreement)(Carnie, Kevin) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court Plaintiffs Weibin Lam and Nancy Thompson's Motion to Remand and Memorandum in Support to state court filed by Defendant General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Strauss, Stephen) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court Plaintiffs Weibin Lam and Nancy Thompson's Motion to Remand and Memorandum in Support to state court by Plaintiffs Weibin Lam, Nancy Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Petition for Wrongful Death, #2 Exhibit 2 - Second Amended Petition for Wrongful Death, #3 Exhibit 3 - Third Amended Petition, #4 Exhibit 4 - Certificate of Service)(Carnie, Kevin) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement (BAK) |
Filing 12 PROTECTIVE ORDER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(BAK) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice by Plaintiffs Weibin Lam, Nancy Thompson. Joe-K Used Cars, LLC terminated. Attorney Theresa A. Phelps terminated. (BAK) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to 3rd Amended Complaint by Estate of Nikita Thompson, Nikita Thompson.(BAK) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to 3rd Amended Complaint by General Motors LLC.(BAK) |
Filing 8 Third Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St Louis, filed by Nancy Thompson, Weibin Lam.(BAK) |
Filing 7 First Amended Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St Louis, filed by Nancy Thompson, Weibin Lam.(BAK) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk. (BAK) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant General Motors LLC Sent To: State Court - Executed (Strauss, Stephen) |
Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Timothy J. Hasken for Defendant General Motors LLC. (Hasken, Timothy) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant General Motors LLC Sent To: Plaintiff (Strauss, Stephen) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Stephen G. Strauss for Defendant General Motors LLC. (Strauss, Stephen) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant General Motors LLC.. (Strauss, Stephen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis City Circuit Court, case number 1922-CC10777-01, with receipt number AMOEDC-8471872, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #12 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Strauss, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.