Walker v. Saul
| Martha Walker |
| Andrew Saul |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 4:2021cv00185 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Nicholas P. Llewellyn for Defendant Andrew Saul. (Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Martha Walker. Defendant Andrew Saul served on 2/19/2021, answer due 4/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Service to Attorney General, #2 Service to OGC)(Williams, Franklin) (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/1/2021) (TMT). (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/1/2021) (TMT). (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/1/2021) (TMT). |
Filing 2
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 4 (Administrative). Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on February 16, 2021. (BRP)
|
| Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT with receipt number AMOEDC-8472183, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - No,, filed by Martha Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Summons Attorney General, #5 Summons Office of General Counsel)(Williams, Franklin) |
| Case Opening Notification: 3 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Franklin A. Williams. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
