Ketsenburg v. ChexSystems, Incorporated
| Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg |
| ChexSystems, Incorporated |
| 4:2021cv00220 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Noelle C Collins |
| Ronnie L White |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Ronnie L. White for all further proceedings (BRP) |
Filing 16
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #13 ) is DENIED, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on March 29, 2021. (BRP)
|
| Filing 15 AMENDED certificate of service by Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg re: #13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and #14 Memorandum in Support of Motion. (KXS) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support of #13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1, #2 Envelope)(KXS) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg. (KXS) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg. Registered Agent, CT Corporation, served on behalf of ChexSystems, Inc., on 3/23/2021. Note: Defendant ChexSystems was previously served by waiver on 3/12/2021. (KXS) |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL re #10 Waiver of Service Executed by Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg. (TMT) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by ChexSystems, Incorporated ChexSystems, Incorporated waiver signed on 3/15/2021, answer due 5/14/2021. (Alvarez, Victoria) |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant ChexSystems, Incorporated. Parent companies: eFunds Corporation; Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.,. (Alvarez, Victoria) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance: by Defendant ChexSystems, Incorporated (Alvarez, Victoria) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to defendant ChexSystems, Incorporated. The summons was hand delivered to USMS. (BRP) |
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for service of process at government expense [ECF No. #3 ] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as to plaintiff's claims brought pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681, et seq., the Clerk of the Court shall issue process or cause process to issue upon defendant ChexSystems, Incorporated at: 7805 Hudson Road, Suite 100, Woodbury, Minnesota 55125. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on March 15, 2021. (BRP)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6. Sent to non-electronic party this date. Mon Mar 15 14:48:22 CDT 2021 (Porter, Brittany)
|
| Filing 5 Original Filing Form re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg. (BRP) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE MOTION For Service Of Process At Government Expense by Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg. (JKL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg. (JKL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant ChexSystems, Incorporated, Jury Demand, filed by Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Envelope)(JKL) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JKL) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Feb 22 14:01:14 CST 2021 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. (JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ketsenburg v. ChexSystems, Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Matthew Ketsenburg | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ChexSystems, Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Victoria Anna Alvarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
