Galati v. Medicredit, Inc.
| Lisa Galati |
| Medicredit, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv00263 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCER This case is assigned to Track: Track 2. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: [see full order for details.] (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 5/25/2021. Rule 16 Conference set for 6/1/2021 10:00 AM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 4/6/2021. (JMP)
|
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Isaac Joseph Bressler for Plaintiff Lisa Galati. (Bressler, Isaac) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Medicredit, Inc..(Meadows, Megan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Medicredit, Inc. Sent To: State Court - Executed (Meadows, Megan) |
| Filing 6 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig for all further proceedings. (KXS) |
| Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County Missouri, filed by Lisa Galati.(BAK) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Scott J. Dickenson for Defendant Medicredit, Inc.. (Dickenson, Scott) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Medicredit, Inc.. Parent companies: Medicredit is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parallon Revenue Cycle Services, Inc., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Meadows, Megan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Medicredit, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Meadows, Megan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 20SL-AC21154, with receipt number AMOEDC-8505377, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Medicredit, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meadows, Megan) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Galati v. Medicredit, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Medicredit, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Megan D. Meadows |
| Represented By: | Scott J. Dickenson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lisa Galati | |
| Represented By: | Dominic M. Pontello |
| Represented By: | Isaac Joseph Bressler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
