Thomas v. Republic Telecom Services, Inc. et al
Niesha S Thomas |
Republic Telecom Services, Inc. and Luis Lorenzo Barrios |
4:2021cv00274 |
March 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Noelle C Collins |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Summons Issued as to defendant Luis Lorenzo Barrios. The summons was emailed to Tarun B. Rana. (BRP) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM re #13 Notice of Process Server by Plaintiff Niesha S Thomas. (Rana, Tarun) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Niesha S Thomas Process Server: Cole Investigative Agency/Glenn Cole (Rana, Tarun) |
Filing 12 Disclosure of Expert Witness Name(s): PLAINTIFFS DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 33 AND RULE 26(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE by Plaintiff Niesha S Thomas. (Rana, Tarun) |
Filing 11 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Republic Telecom Services, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Wilke, James) |
Filing 10 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Defendant Republic Telecom Services, Inc.. Civil Cover Sheet. (Wilke, James) |
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by James A. Wilke for Defendant Republic Telecom Services, Inc.. (Wilke, James) |
Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Republic Telecom Services, Inc.. (Wilke, Daniel) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Republic Telecom Services, Inc..(Wilke, Daniel) |
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Daniel E. Wilke for Defendant Republic Telecom Services, Inc.. (Wilke, Daniel) |
Filing 5 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Republic Telecom Services, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 3/15/2021. (KCD) |
Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (FLJ) |
Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St Louis, filed by Niesha S Thomas.(BAK) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Luis Lorenzo Barrios, Republic Telecom Services, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (BAK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from City of St. Louis, case number 2122-CC00209, with receipt number AMOEDC-8512175, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Luis Lorenzo Barrios, Republic Telecom Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Original Filing Form, #3 Summons, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Petition filed in State Court, #5 Exhibit State Court Pleadings, #6 Exhibit Notice to Attorney)(Wilke, James) |
Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.