Kuhn v. AutoAssure LLC.
| Donald Kuhn |
| AutoAssure LLC and AutoAssure LLC. |
| 4:2021cv00394 |
| April 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice E. Jason Tremblay and #14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Alexander L. Reich; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/20/2021. (LNJ)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Alexander L. Reich. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8637862) by Defendant AutoAssure LLC. (LNJ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice E. Jason Tremblay. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8636052) by Defendant AutoAssure LLC. (LNJ) |
| Filing 12 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge David D. Noce termed. Case reassigned to District Judge John A. Ross for all further proceedings (KJS) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by AutoAssure LLC..(Schowalter, Timm) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Zachary Stephen Merkle for Defendant AutoAssure LLC.. (Merkle, Zachary) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Timm W. Schowalter for Defendant AutoAssure LLC.. (Schowalter, Timm) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Donald Kuhn. AutoAssure LLC. served on 4/15/2021, answer due 5/6/2021. (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard J. Burch for Plaintiff Donald Kuhn. (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Notice - Application for Admission needed as to Richard J. Burch. Review of case shows that Attorney Richard J. Burch is not currently a member of our Bar. For instructions on applying for bar admission or moving for pro hac vice admission, please follow the instructions located on our website at #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov under the Attorney tab. Notice only, no.pdf attached. (JKL) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff Donald Kuhn. (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Donald Kuhn (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Donald Kuhn. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Summons)(Burch, Richard) |
| Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Attorney Richard J. Burch. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable David D. Noce. (JKL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant AutoAssure LLC with receipt number AMOEDC-8568296, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Donald Kuhn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Written Consent)(Burch, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
