Transactly, Inc. v. Glidden, et al
TRANSACTLY, INC. |
Alexander Hayden, John Doe, Luke Patton, John Doe doing business as Transactify, Luke Patton individually and doing business as Transactify, Alexander Glidden, Eric Bramlett and Jaden Black |
4:2021cv00421 |
April 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Stephen R Clark |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 44 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant Eric Bramlett. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Eric Bramlett)(Wheelock, Bryan) |
Filing 21 ENTRY of Appearance by Edward Coach Weinhaus for Plaintiff Transactly, Inc.. (Weinhaus, Edward) |
Filing 20 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Eric Bramlett. (Wheelock, Bryan) ; ORDERED GRANTED. Eric Bramlett answer due 6/1/2021. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 5/17/2021. (CLO) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Eric Bramlett. (Wheelock, Bryan) |
Filing 18 ENTRY of Appearance by Bryan K. Wheelock for Defendant Eric Bramlett. (Wheelock, Bryan) |
Filing 17 ENTRY of Appearance by Joel R. Samuels for Defendant Eric Bramlett. (Samuels, Joel) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Transactly, Inc.. Jaden Black served on 5/7/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Transactly, Inc.. Alexander Glidden served on 4/28/2021, answer due 5/19/2021. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Transactly, Inc.. Eric Bramlett served on 4/27/2021, answer due 5/18/2021. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 13 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker termed. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, a request has been received for random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled cause is randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker to District Judge Stephen R. Clark for all further proceedings. (CBL) |
Judge Clark enters a Standing Order in all of his cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/stephen-r-clark (CBL) |
Filing 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Transactly, Inc. as to Alexander Glidden. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 Alias Summons Issued as to defendant Alexander Glidden. The summons was emailed to Jeffrey Kass. (MCB) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to defendant Jaden Black, Eric Bramlett. The summons were emailed to Jeffrey Kass. (MCB) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Transactly, Inc.. Luke Patton served on 4/12/2021, answer due 5/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service on Luke Patton)(Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Transactly, Inc. as to Alexander Hayden. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 NOTICE Intent to Use Process Server: by Plaintiff Transactly, Inc. re #3 Notice (Other), #1 Complaint, #5 Report re:Patent/Trademark/Copyright, #2 Disclosure of OrganizationalInterests Certificate, #6 Amended Complaint,, 4 Case Assignment Local Rule 2.08, (Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Jaden Black, Alexander Glidden, Eric Bramlett Amendment to #1 Complaint, two to date Summons(es) issued, Waivers issued N/A, Consents issued N/A, Jury demand, , filed by Transactly, Inc.. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Transactly, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Amended Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet (Amended), #3 Summons Alias - to be issued to Alexander Glidden, #4 Summons Amended - to be issued to Luke Patton, #5 Summons to be issued to Jaden Black, #6 Summons to be issued to Eric Bramlett, #7 Original Filing Form (Amended))(Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding trademark. (BAK) |
Judge Baker enters a Standing Order in all of her cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/nannette-baker (CBL) |
Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Jeffrey H. Kass. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE Intent to Use Process Server: by Plaintiff TRANSACTLY, INC. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff TRANSACTLY, INC.. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition against defendant John Doe, Alexander Hayden, Luke Patton with receipt number AMOEDC-8580792, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by TRANSACTLY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Summons to Alexander Hayden (to be issued), #5 Summons to Luke Patton (to be issued))(Kass, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.