Comparato v. Precythe et al
| Daultyn James Comparato |
| Bill Stang, Ann Precythe and Jennifer Price |
| 4:2021cv00448 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter to Mr. Linhares from Daultyn Comparato re:Inmate Account. (KCD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Apr 20 11:01:27 CDT 2021 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by Plaintiff Daultyn James Comparato. (DLB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Daultyn James Comparato. (DLB) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendant Ann Precythe, Jennifer Price, Bill Stain Jury Demand,, filed by Daultyn James Comparato. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment, #3 Envelope, #4 Judge Assignment Label)(DLB) #5 Original Filing Form) (DLB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
