Laub v. Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Cindy Laub
Defendant: Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc. and Leidos, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv00508
Filed: April 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nannette A Baker
Referring Judge: Rodney W Sippel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2021 Filing 17 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Cindy Laub. . (Ponder, Douglas)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE. This case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 7/14/2021. Rule 16 Conference set for 7/21/2021 10:00 AM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Rodney W. Sippel... SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 06/01/2021. (ANP)
May 21, 2021 Filing 15 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Rodney W. Sippel for all further proceedings. (KXS)
May 17, 2021 Filing 14 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Leidos, Inc.. Parent companies: Leidos Holdings, Inc., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.,. (Todd, Eric)
May 17, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative and Other Defenses by Leidos, Inc..(Todd, Eric)
May 17, 2021 Filing 12 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Leidos, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 5/27/2021. (CBL)
May 17, 2021 Filing 11 Consent to Removal by Defendant Leidos, Inc.. (Todd, Eric)
May 17, 2021 Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Eric A. Todd for Defendant Leidos, Inc.. (Todd, Eric)
May 17, 2021 Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Mallory Stumpf Zoia for Defendant Leidos, Inc.. (Zoia, Mallory)
April 30, 2021 Judge Baker enters a Standing Order in all of her cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/nannette-baker (CBL)
April 30, 2021 Filing 8 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK) (KXS).
April 30, 2021 Filing 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
April 30, 2021 Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St Louis, filed by Cindy Laub.(BAK)
April 30, 2021 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc.. Parent companies: Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc.,. (Halbrook, Karen)
April 30, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc..(Halbrook, Karen)
April 30, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Halbrook, Karen)
April 30, 2021 Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Karen J. Halbrook for Defendant Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc.. (Halbrook, Karen)
April 30, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis City, case number 2022-CC10386, with receipt number AMOEDC-8619800, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Halbrook, Karen) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/30/2021: #3 Original Filing Form) (BAK). (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/14/2021: #4 State court docket sheet) (KXS).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laub v. Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cindy Laub
Represented By: Douglas B. Ponder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allstaff Technical Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Karen J. Halbrook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leidos, Inc.
Represented By: Eric A. Todd
Represented By: Mallory Stumpf Zoia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?