Martin v. Riverside Pizza Company et al
| Amanda Martin |
| Riverside Pizza Company and Leonard J. Naugle |
| 4:2021cv00670 |
| June 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Amanda Martin (Haynie, David) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Plaintiff Amanda Martin of Filing Certificate of Interested Parties (Haynie, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8692600, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Amanda Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Summons for Riverside Pizza Company, #4 Summons Summons for Naugle, #5 Exhibit 1)(Haynie, David) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/10/2021 to correct signature block) (JKL). |
| Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Attorney David Matthew Haynie. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.