Marshall v. Quiktrip #636 et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Marshall
Defendant: John Doe and Quiktrip #636
Case Number: 4:2021cv00787
Filed: June 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nannette A Baker
Referring Judge: Matthew T Schelp
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2021 Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court City of St. Louis filed by Defendant Quiktrip #636. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Kim Hager)(Reh, Matthew)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2 Motion to Join Parties due by 10/29/2021. Discovery Completion due by 7/8/2022. Non-Dispositive Motions due by 7/19/2022. ADR Future Reference 7/8/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 8/18/2022. Jury Trial set for 12/19/2022 08:30 AM in Courtroom 14S - St. Louis before District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. Pretrial Compliance due by 11/29/2022. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 8/3/2021. (KXS)
August 3, 2021 Filing 13 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before District Judge Matthew T. Schelp:Rule 16 Conference held on 8/3/2021. Conference held by zoom. CMO to issue. (proceedings started: 10:04am) (proceedings ended: 10:07am) (Appearance for Plaintiff: Thomas Fagan)(Appearance for Defendant: Katherine Ricks) (KCD)
July 30, 2021 Filing 12 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Defendant Quiktrip #636. Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan. (Ricks, Katherine)
July 30, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to Circuit Court City of St. Louis by Plaintiff Elizabeth Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Suggestions in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Suggestions in Support, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Suggestions in Support, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Suggestions in Support)(Fagan, Thomas)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: two Joint Scheduling Plan due by 7/30/2021. Rule 16 Conference set for 8/3/2021 10:00 AM in Zoom Video Conference before District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 07/20/2021. (KCD)
July 7, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Quiktrip #636.(Ricks, Katherine)
July 6, 2021 Filing 8 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Matthew T. Schelp for all further proceedings. (KXS)
July 1, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Quiktrip #636 Sent To: State Court - Executed (Ricks, Katherine)
July 1, 2021 Judge Baker enters a Standing Order in all of her cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/nannette-baker (MCB)
June 30, 2021 Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
June 30, 2021 Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St Louis, filed by Elizabeth Marshall.(BAK)
June 30, 2021 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Katherine Margaret Ricks for Defendant QUIKTRIP #636. (Ricks, Katherine)
June 30, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant QUIKTRIP #636 Sent To: Plaintiff (Reh, Matthew)
June 30, 2021 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant QUIKTRIP #636. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Reh, Matthew)
June 30, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, case number 2122-CC00941, with receipt number AMOEDC-8731609, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by QUIKTRIP #636. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Reh, Matthew)
June 30, 2021 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. (BAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. Quiktrip #636 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quiktrip #636
Represented By: Matthew J. Reh
Represented By: Katherine Margaret Ricks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Marshall
Represented By: Thomas E. Fagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?