Bhattacharjee v. Craig
Plaintiff: Rahul Bhattacharjee
Defendant: Jeanne Marie Craig
Case Number: 4:2021cv00826
Filed: July 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Sarah E Pitlyk
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 11601
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2021 Filing 19 Exhibit List by Defendant Jeanne Marie Craig. (Slaby, David)
September 3, 2021 Filing 18 WITNESS LIST by Defendant Jeanne Marie Craig. (Slaby, David)
September 3, 2021 Filing 17 Exhibit List by Plaintiff Rahul Bhattacharjee. (Min, Richard)
September 3, 2021 Filing 16 WITNESS LIST by Plaintiff Rahul Bhattacharjee. (Min, Richard)
September 3, 2021 Filing 15 TRIAL BRIEF Respondent's Pre-Trial Brief by Defendant Jeanne Marie Craig. (Slaby, David)
September 3, 2021 Filing 14 TRIAL BRIEF by Plaintiff Rahul Bhattacharjee. (Marks, Jonathan)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case is assigned to Track: 2, Bench Trial set for 9/13/2021 09:00 AM in Courtroom 16N - St. Louis before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk, Pretrial Conference set for 9/8/2021 09:00 AM in Courtroom 16N - St. Louis before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk, Pretrial Compliance due by 9/3/2021, Motion in Limine due by 9/7/2021... SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 09/03/2021. (ANP)
August 16, 2021 Filing 12 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk:Rule 16 Conference held on 8/16/2021. Conference held by Zoom. Expedited timeline approved. CMO to issue. (Court Reporter:Laura Esposito, Laura_Esposito@moed.uscourts.gov) (proceedings started: 1:06 p.m.) (proceedings ended: 2:16 p.m.) (Deputy Clerk: K. Kratzer)(Appearance for Plaintiff: Jonathan Marks & Richard Min)(Appearance for Defendant: David Slaby) (KEK)
August 11, 2021 Filing 11 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Rahul Bhattacharjee. . (Marks, Jonathan)
August 10, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Expedite Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Expedite Proceedings Pursuant to Hague Convention filed by Defendant Jeanne Marie Craig. (Slaby, David)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that... Joint Scheduling Plan due by 8/11/2021. Rule 16 Conference set for 8/16/2021 01:00 PM in Zoom Video Conference before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk... SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 08/03/2021. (ANP)
August 3, 2021 Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by David M. Slaby for Defendant Jeanne Marie Craig. (Slaby, David)
August 2, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Expedite by Plaintiff Rahul Bhattacharjee. (Marks, Jonathan)
July 30, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Jeanne Marie Craig.(Slaby, David)
July 30, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Rahul Bhattacharjee. Jeanne Marie Craig served on 7/9/2021, answer due 7/30/2021. (Marks, Jonathan)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Richard Min. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8768904) by Plaintiff Rahul Bhattacharjee. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing Certificate of Good Standing)(Min, Richard) filed by Rahul Bhattacharjee; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 7/23/2021. (KEK)
July 21, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Richard Min. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8768904) by Plaintiff Rahul Bhattacharjee. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing Certificate of Good Standing)(Min, Richard)
July 8, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Rahul Bhattacharjee Process Server: Jeff Aronson (JKL)
July 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for REturn of the Child to Petitioner against defendant Jeanne Marie Craig with receipt number AMOEDC-8745714, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Rahul Bhattacharjee. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Intent to Use Process Server, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Exhibit The Hague Convention, #6 Exhibit ICARA, #7 Judgment, #8 Affidavit)(Marks, Jonathan)
July 8, 2021 Case Opening Notification: 1 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Attorney Jonathan D. Marks. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JKL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bhattacharjee v. Craig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rahul Bhattacharjee
Represented By: Jonathan D. Marks
Represented By: Richard Min
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeanne Marie Craig
Represented By: David M. Slaby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?