Estate of Jeanette Tolen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Estate of Jeanette Tolen |
Auto-Owners Insurance Company |
4:2021cv00872 |
July 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss :Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Petition filed by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Hansmann, Bradley) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss :Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Petition filed by Plaintiff Estate of Jeanette Tolen. (Ledbetter, Frank) |
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, State Court Docket Sheet by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Hansmann, Bradley) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, Original Filing Form by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Hansmann, Bradley) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JKL) |
Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Saint Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Jeanette Tolen.(JKL) |
Filing 6 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Hansmann, Bradley) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM In Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Suggestions in Support of Motion to Dismiss :Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Petition by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Hansmann, Bradley) Modified on 7/16/2021 to correct docketing event (JWD). |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss :Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Petition by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Hansmann, Bradley) |
Filing 3 Defendant Auto Owner Insurance Company's ANSWER to Complaint by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Hansmann, Bradley) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1)(Hansmann, Bradley) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 21SL-00012, with receipt number AMOEDC-8761505, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A, #2 Exhibit Ex B, #3 Exhibit Ex C, #4 Exhibit Ex D)(Hansmann, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Estate of Jeanette Tolen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Estate of Jeanette Tolen | |
Represented By: | Frank R. Ledbetter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Auto-Owners Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Bradley R. Hansmann |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.