Williams v. LG Chem, Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Robert A. Williams
Defendant: LG Chem, Ltd. and LG Chem America, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv00966
Filed: August 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Clark
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Docket Text ORDER: The Court observes that the ninety-day deadline for service-of-process does not apply to service in a foreign country. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 4(m). The Court orders that Plaintiff must file either (1) proof of service of summons and complaint on LG Chem, Ltd. or (2) a report on the status of that service and a request for a reasonable amount of time to serve Defendant LG Chem, Ltd., no later than December 22, 2021. The Court further orders that Plaintiff make diligent efforts to effect service on LG Chem, Ltd. The Court denies Plaintiff's #12 Motion for Extension of Time without prejudice. (Response to Court due by 12/22/2021.) Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/23/2021. (LNJ)
September 22, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of: Time to File Service Regarding Defendant LG Chem, Ltd. by Plaintiff Robert A. Williams. (Simon, John)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants #10 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Response due by 10/13/2021. The Court does not anticipate granting further extensions. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/9/2021. (CLO)
September 8, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Plaintiff Robert A. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Proposed Order)(Simon, John)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/7/2021. (LNJ)
September 7, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Jonathan E. Taylor. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8852231) by Plaintiff Robert A. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing Certificate of Good Standing)(Taylor, Jonathan)
September 3, 2021 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant LG Chem America, Inc.. Parent companies: LG Chem, Ltd., Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: LG Chem, Ltd. owns all of LG Chem America, Inc.'s stock. LG Chem, Ltd. is a publicly traded company,. (Hedley, Rachel)
September 1, 2021 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Brian R. Plegge for Defendant LG Chem America, Inc.. (Plegge, Brian)
August 30, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant LG Chem America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Memorandum in support of LGCAI MTD, #2 Exhibit Kim Declaration iso LGCAI MTD)(Hedley, Rachel)
August 11, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Robert A. Williams. LG Chem America, Inc. served on 8/9/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. (Simon, John)
August 4, 2021 Judge Clark enters a Standing Order in all of his cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/stephen-r-clark (CLO)
August 3, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Robert Williams Process Server: APS International, Ltd. (Simon, John)
August 3, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Robert Williams Process Server: Mark Smith of Markell and Associates (Simon, John)
August 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8791782, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Robert Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Summons - LG Chem, Ltd., #4 Summons Summons - LG Chem America, Inc.)(Simon, John)
August 3, 2021 Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to attorney John Simon. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Clark. (JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. LG Chem, Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert A. Williams
Represented By: John Matthew Simon
Represented By: Jonathan Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LG Chem, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LG Chem America, Inc.
Represented By: Rachel A. Hedley
Represented By: Brian R. Plegge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?