Mangold et al v. Cavalry SPV I, LLC et al
| SHANA MANGOLD and KRISTOPHER MANGOLD |
| CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, WILLIAM MARTIN and CITY OF CENTER, MO |
| 4:2021cv01063 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error in the Eastern District. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Northern Division is 2:21cv54 NAB. (BAK) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs KRISTOPHER MANGOLD, SHANA MANGOLD Process Server: Patricia Beilsmith (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs KRISTOPHER MANGOLD, SHANA MANGOLD Process Server: Mark Effinger (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Richard A. Voytas, Jr for Plaintiffs KRISTOPHER MANGOLD, SHANA MANGOLD. (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8831576, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by SHANA MANGOLD, KRISTOPHER MANGOLD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Voytas, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
