Alejrish v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Shahad Alejrish |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Kathy Baran |
| 4:2021cv01082 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Shahad Alejrish. Defendant Kathy Baran served on 9/10/2021, answer due 11/9/2021; Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 10/19/2021, answer due 12/20/2021; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 10/19/2021, answer due 12/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return Receipts)(Hacking, James) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint, Original Filing Form by Plaintiff Shahad Alejrish. (Hacking, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Kathy Baran, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services with receipt number AMOEDC-8841814, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Shahad Alejrish. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet EDM, #2 Summons Ur M Jaddou, #3 Summons USCIS, #4 Summons Kathy Baran, #5 Summons US A, #6 Summons AG US)(Hacking, James) |
| Case Opening Notification: 5 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to Attorney James O. Hacking, III. Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
