Tucker v. Security Systems, Inc et al
| Arlie Tucker |
| Monitronics International, Inc., Security Systems, Inc., Safe Home Security, Inc., The Brink Company, Alarm Services LLC and The Brink's Company |
| 4:2021cv01094 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patricia L Cohen |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the joint stipulation to stay proceedings [ECF No. #17 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proceedings in this lawsuit are STAYED until Monday, November 22, 2021 so the parties may pursue settlement efforts. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit to the Court a status report on Monday, November 22, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 10/20/2021. (CLO)
|
| Filing 17 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Defendants Monitronics International, Inc., The Brink's Company. (Fogarty, Glennon) |
|
Filing 16
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) or Otherwise Respond by Defendants Monitronics International, Inc., The Brink's Company. (Fogarty, Glennon) ; ORDERED GRANTED. Monitronics International, Inc. answer due 10/19/2021; The Brink's Company answer due 10/19/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 10/13/21. (JAB)
|
| Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) or Otherwise Respond by Defendants Monitronics International, Inc., The Brink's Company. (Fogarty, Glennon) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #13 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to 21st Judicial Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri filed by Plaintiff Arlie Tucker. (Yiatras, Tiffany) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to 21st Judicial Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri by Plaintiff Arlie Tucker. (Yiatras, Tiffany) |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant The Brink's Company. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Fogarty, Glennon) |
|
Filing 11
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Disclosure of Organizational Interests ;Proposed extension date 10/5/2021 by Defendant The Brink's Company. (Fogarty, Glennon); ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 9/29/2021. (LNJ)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Disclosure of Organizational Interests ;Proposed extension date 10/5/2021 by Defendant The Brink's Company. (Fogarty, Glennon) |
| Filing 9 Electronic Notice of Noncompliance - Review of this case shows the Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate has not been filed by Defendant The Brink's Company. The certificate must be filed with the Court within 5 days # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 9/28/2021. (JAB) |
|
Filing 8
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) or Otherwise Respond by Defendants Monitronics International, Inc., The Brink's Company. (Fogarty, Glennon) filed by The Brink's Company, Monitronics International, Inc. ; ORDERED GRANTED. (Monitronics International, Inc. answer due 10/12/2021; The Brink's Company answer due 10/12/2021.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 9/9/21. (JAB)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) or Otherwise Respond by Defendants Monitronics International, Inc., The Brink's Company. (Fogarty, Glennon) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Monitronics International, Inc. Sent To: State Court - Executed (Fogarty, Glennon) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County Missouri, filed by Arlie Tucker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(BAK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Monitronics International, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Fogarty, Glennon) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Monitronics International, Inc.. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen. (BAK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 21SL-CC03384, with receipt number BMOEDC-8848307, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Monitronics International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit A -Summons and Petition, #4 Exhibit B - State Court Case File, #5 Exhibit C - Declaration of Jonathan Faber)(Fogarty, Glennon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
