Hayes v. Precythe et al
LaJuan Hayes |
Anne Precythe, Brook Whittom, Superintendent Doris Falkenrath, Unknown Pitts, Terry Kingcade, Unknown Hightower, Jason Lewis and Corizon Health Service, LLC |
4:2021cv01115 |
September 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Receipt 4644096591 in the amount of $402.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE on behalf of LAJUAN HAYES (CCAM) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff LaJuan Hayes. (ANP) |
Filing 2 Letter to The Clerk of Court from Plaintiff re:Request Attorney Form. (form sent on this date.) (KRZ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, Jury Demand, filed by LaJuan Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence, #2 Exhibit - Grievance Appeal Response, #3 Exhibit - Violation Reports, #4 Exhibit - Missouri Advocacy and Protection Services, #5 Envelope)(JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Sep 13 16:01:06 CDT 2021 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.