Zaidi v. The Bank of Missouri
| Akbar Zaidi |
| Bank of Missouri and The Bank of Missouri |
| 4:2021cv01136 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error in the Eastern Division. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Southeastern Division is 1:21cv138 ACL. (BAK) Modified on 9/22/2021 (CMH). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Akbar Zaidi Process Server: Always Available Services LLC (Orlowski, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Akbar Zaidi. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Orlowski, Samantha) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT And Jury Demand against defendant Bank of Missouri with receipt number AMOEDC-8877044, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Akbar Zaidi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Police Report, #2 Exhibit Equifax Report, #3 Exhibit Letter from Provident Funding, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form, #6 Summons)(Orlowski, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
