Loggins v. Hollins et al
Plaintiff: Daryl Loggins
Defendant: Gerard W. Hollins and Jake Zimmerman
Case Number: 4:2021cv01139
Filed: September 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Ronnie L White
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); Rule 12(h)(3), Fed. R. Civ. P. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this order of dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/14/2021. (KCD)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim or legal frivolousness. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/14/2021. (KCD)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5,6. Thu Oct 14 09:55:44 CDT 2021 (Davis, Kinica)
September 27, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COURT OF A TRAIL BY JURY by Plaintiff Daryl Loggins. (KCD)
September 27, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE TO COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 201(D) REQUIRES FREE ACCESS TO JUDICIAL TRIBUNALS BY A NATURAL INDIVIDUAL WITH A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PETITION THE COURT SET BY PRECEDENCE CRANDALL V. NEV ADA, 73 US 35 - SUPREME COURT1868 by Plaintiff Daryl Loggins (KCD)
September 22, 2021 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Sep 22 10:01:05 CDT 2021 (admin,)
September 22, 2021 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Ronnie L. White. (BAK)
September 22, 2021 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (BAK)
September 21, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Daryl Loggins. (BAK)
September 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Gerard W. Hollins, Jake Zimmerman Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Daryl Loggins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form)(BAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loggins v. Hollins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daryl Loggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gerard W. Hollins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jake Zimmerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?