McGuire v. Clemons-Abdullah
| Branden McGuire |
| Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah |
| 4:2021cv01310 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Abbie Crites-Leoni |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 2241. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on December 14, 2021. (MCB)
|
|
Filing 7
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Branden McGuire. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241, as well as his amended application for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED. A separate order of dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent petitioner has any civil rights claims within his petition relating to his conditions of confinement, those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide petitioner a court-form for filing a prisoner civil rights action, as well as an accompanying application for proceeding without paying fees or costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 12/14/2021. (JEB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 7, 8. sent to non-electronic party along with the Court's prisoner civil rights form as well as the application to proceed without paying fees or costs Tue Dec 14 16:38:31 CST 2021 (Berg, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Branden McGuire. (MRS)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Branden McGuire. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Correspondence)(MRS)
|
|
Filing 4
SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Branden McGuire. (MRS)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mail to petitioner a copy of the Court's form "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mail to petitioner acopy of the Court's form "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support-Habeas Cases."IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall file an amended petition on the Court provided form within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner is advised that his amended petition will take the place of his original petition and will be the only pleading that this Court will review. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall either pay the $5 filing fee or submit the "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support - Habeas Cases" within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 11/24/2021.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/3/21. (MRS)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. w/copy of 2241 form and motion to proceed ifp- habeas cases - as ordered Wed Nov 3 14:48:56 CDT 2021 (Schaefer, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 2
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Branden McGuire. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JWD)
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Abbie S. Crites-Leoni. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Nov 1 17:00:52 CDT 2021 (admin,)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McGuire v. Clemons-Abdullah | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Branden McGuire | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah | |
| Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
