Potter v. Lewis et al
| Christopher J. Potter |
| Scott Lewis, Drevon Moore and Kayci Kirsch |
| 4:2021cv01319 |
| November 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Shirley Padmore Mensah |
| John A Ross |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Christopher J. Potter. (JWD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Christopher J. Potter. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Kayci Kirsch, Scott Lewis, Drevon Moore, Jury Demand, filed by Christopher J. Potter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Probable Cause Statement, #2 Exhibit B - Warrant/Summons Application, #3 Envelope)(JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Nov 4 15:01:09 CDT 2021 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Shirley P. Mensah. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
