Metzler et al v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Paula Metzler, Mary Manthey, Dylan Gerik and Brynnen Gerik |
Hunter Warfield, Inc. |
4:2021cv01384 |
November 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
David D Noce |
Catherine D Perry |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16, set for January 21, 2022, is vacated and all pending motions are denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, a stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Dismissal Paper(s) due by 2/17/2022.) Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 1/18/2022. (NEP) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by All Plaintiffs (Roberts, Christopher) |
Filing 10 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiffs Brynnen Gerik, Dylan Gerik, Mary Manthey, Paula Metzler. . (Roberts, Christopher) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: This case is assigned to Track: 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 1/14/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 1/21/2022 01:00 PM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Catherine D. Perry. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS] Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/10/2021. (KEK) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Hunter Warfield, Inc..(Watts, Patrick) |
Filing 7 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge David D. Noce termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Catherine D. Perry for all further proceedings (KJS) |
Filing 6 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Hunter Warfield, Inc.. Parent companies: HWI Holding, Inc.,. (Watts, Patrick) |
Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of Jefferson County, filed by Paula Metzler, Brynnen Gerik, Dylan Gerik, Mary Manthey.(JKL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Hunter Warfield, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Watts, Patrick) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Patrick A. Watts for Defendant Hunter Warfield, Inc.. (Watts, Patrick) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jefferson County Circuit Court, case number 21JE-CC00686, with receipt number AMOEDC-8994938, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Hunter Warfield, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Petition, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form)(Watts, Patrick) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable David D. Noce. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). (JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.