Baalim v. Fowler
| Malak Baalim and Norbert K.O. Cody |
| Judge Katherine Fowler and Brandi Archabeau |
| 4:2021cv01411 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Abbie Crites-Leoni |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SUPPLEMENTAL re Consent to Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Malak Baalim. (MRS)
|
|
Filing 7
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Malak Baalim. Returned document(s): #3 Memorandum & Order. Mail was returned as "Name not found" Mail was resent to St Louis City Justice Center, but addressed to Norbert Cody a/k/a Malak Baalim (MRS)
|
|
Filing 6
Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Malak Baalim. (MRS)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Malak Baalim. (MRS)
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Katherine Fowler, Brandi Archabeau Amendment to #1 Complaint, filed by Malak Baalim. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Malak Baalim. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Envelope)(MRS)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff must either file an application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees of costs on a Court-provided form, accompanied by a certified prison account statement, or pay the full $402 filing fee within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff must follow the instructions provided on the Court form.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit an amended complaint on a Court-provided form within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send to plaintiff a copy of the Courts form application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees of costs.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a blank Prisoner Civil Complaint form.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely comply with this Memorandum and Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. Response to Court due by 12/23/2021.. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 12/2/21. (MRS)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. w/ complaint form and form to file ifp as ordered Thu Dec 2 12:49:41 CST 2021 (Schaefer, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 2
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Abbie S. Crites-Leoni. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Dec 1 11:00:47 CST 2021 (admin,)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against defendant Katherine Fowler, Non-Jury Demand, filed by Malak Baalim. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JWD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
