Lindsey et al v. John Doe #1 et al
Booker Lindsey |
John Doe #1, Unknown Francis, Unknown Since, Unknown Vandergriff and John Doe #2 |
4:2021cv01512 |
December 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Booker Lindsey. (KEK) |
Filing 4 Letter to United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri from Plaintiff re: Restraining order (KRZ) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Booker Lindsey. (JKL) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Booker Lindsey. (JKL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Booker Lindsey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit Note regarding exhibits, #4 Exhibit Letter to Grievance Officer, #5 Exhibit Letter to Grievance Officer, #6 Attachment PCC Receipt, #7 Envelope)(JKL) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. (JKL) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JKL) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Dec 29 17:01:35 CST 2021 (admin,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.