Warren et al v. City of Normandy
Sharon Warren and Kathy Tracy |
City of Normandy |
4:2022cv00080 |
January 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Audrey G Fleissig |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Timothy J. Reichardt for Defendant City of Normandy. (Reichardt, Timothy) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by City of Normandy.(Mooney, Daniel) |
Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Daniel Timothy Mooney for Defendant City of Normandy. (Mooney, Daniel) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Sharon Warren, Kathy Tracy City of Normandy waiver signed on 1/21/2022, answer due 3/22/2022. (Bridge, Lauren) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Kathy Tracy, Sharon Warren Process Server: D&B Legal Services (Bridge, Lauren) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant City of Normandy with receipt number AMOEDC-9085715, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Sharon Warren, Kathy Tracy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Original Filing Form, #11 Summons)(Bridge, Lauren) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Lauren Hope Bridge. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.