Clausen v Monsanto Company et al
Steven Clausen |
Company Monsanto, Monsanto Company and John Does 1 through 100 inclusive |
4:2022cv00084 |
January 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Catherine D Perry |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Summons Issued as to defendant Monsanto Company. The summons was emailed to attorney E. Kirk. (ANP) |
Filing 3 NOTICE Original Filing Form: by Plaintiff Steven Clausen re Case Opening Notification, #1 Complaint Original Filing Form (Kirk, Emily) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Steven Clausen Process Server: Ace Legal Services (Kirk, Emily) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Catherine D. Perry. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Summons to issue when Notice of Process Server and Original Filing form are filed. (BAK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Company Monsanto with receipt number AMOEDC-9087355, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Steven Clausen. (Attachments: #1 Summons , #2 Civil Cover Sheet )(Kirk, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.