Aminu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Plaintiff: Suraka Yahaya Aminu
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Ann Marie Jordan-Starks
Case Number: 4:2022cv00111
Filed: January 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Noelle C Collins
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Suraka Yahaya Aminu. Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 2/2/2022, answer due 4/2/2022; Ann Marie Jordan-Starks served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 2/2/2022, answer due 4/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mail Receipts)(Hacking, James) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/15/2022) (TMT). Modified on 2/17/2022 (TMT).
January 28, 2022 Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
January 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ann Marie Jordan-Starks, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services with receipt number AMOEDC-9098914, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Suraka Yahaya Aminu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Original Filing Form , #3 Summons Attorney General, #4 Summons US Attorney, #5 Summons Local USCIS Official, #6 Summons Jaddou, #7 Summons USCIS)(Hacking, James)
January 28, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins. 5 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney James O. Hacking, III. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (BAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aminu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suraka Yahaya Aminu
Represented By: James O. Hacking, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ann Marie Jordan-Starks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?