Davis v. Holder et al
| Wilfred Davis |
| Bob Holder, Chad Cooke, Nicole Green, Officer Cummings, Officer Hobbs and Officer Garrett |
| 4:2022cv00120 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Sarah E Pitlyk |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter from plaintiff Wilfred Davis re: delay in getting a certified account statement from prison (ANP) |
| Filing 4 Letter to Court from Wilfred Davis re: delay in receiving inmate account information. (NEP) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Wilfred Davis. (BAK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Wilfred Davis. (BAK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Wilfred Davis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Envelope)(BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk. (BAK) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (BAK) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Feb 1 13:01:15 CST 2022 (admin,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
