McGee v. Inman et al
| Kevin D. McGee |
| Julie Inman and Denise Hacker |
| 4:2022cv00147 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Kevin D. McGee. (TMT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Kevin D. McGee. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Denise Hacker, Julie Inman Jury Demand,, filed by Kevin D. McGee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - "Real Secret Trinity", #2 Envelope)(JWD) [Clerk's note: caption of the complaint lists parties "Federal Courthouse" and "Valerie Huhn." Parties listed in the complaint as "Kevin D. McGee v. Julie Inman and Denise Hacker" and the complaint is signed by plaintiff Kevin D. McGee. Case opened in CM/ECF as "McGee v. Inman et al."] |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Feb 7 16:01:04 CST 2022 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
