Kennemore v. State of Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
| Daniel Eldon Kennemore |
| State of Missouri Department of Mental Health, Valerie Huhn, Angeline Stanislaus, Denise Hacker, Stacy Neff, Jay Englehart and Sekhor Vangala |
| 4:2022cv00180 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patricia L Cohen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Daniel Eldon Kennemore. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CLO) |
| Filing 12 Letter to Court from Plaintiff re: Negotiations for a fair settlement (CLO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/1/2022: #1 Envelope) (CLO). |
| Filing 11 FULL CONSENT has been received by Defendants Jay Englehart, Denise Hacker, Valerie Huhn, Stacy Neff, Angeline Stanislaus, State of Missouri Department of Mental Health, Sekhor Vangala, Plaintiff Daniel Eldon Kennemore. (CBL) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Adam J. Merello for Defendants Jay Englehart, Denise Hacker, Valerie Huhn, Stacy Neff, Angeline Stanislaus, State of Missouri Department of Mental Health, Sekhor Vangala. (Merello, Adam) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Defendants Jay Englehart, Denise Hacker, Valerie Huhn, Stacy Neff, Angeline Stanislaus, State of Missouri Department of Mental Health, Sekhor Vangala to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 3/23/2022. (CBL) |
| Filing 9 Second MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Daniel Eldon Kennemore. (CLO) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Amendment to #1 Complaint, filed by Daniel Eldon Kennemore. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Daniel Eldon Kennemore.(CLO) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Daniel Eldon Kennemore. (Grievance Form) (CBL) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Daniel Eldon Kennemore. (CBL) |
| Filing 5 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Daniel Eldon Kennemore. (CBL) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Daniel Eldon Kennemore. (CBL) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL by Plaintiff Daniel Eldon Kennemore. - Original Filing Form and Civil Cover Sheet received. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter and Envelope)(CBL) |
| Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Daniel Eldon Kennemore. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence, #2 Exhibit Motion to Amend, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Envelope)(JKL) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Patricia L. Cohen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JKL) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Feb 14 16:02:53 CST 2022 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
