Corley v. Blair
| Jerrod Corley |
| Paul Blair |
| 4:2022cv00250 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Corley has failed to comply with the Court's order dated March 1, 2022, requiring him to sign his petition for writ of habeas corpus in compliance with Rule 2(c)(5) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Doc. 3; see also Fed. R. Civ. P.11 (directing a district court to "strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptlycorrected after being called to the... partys attention"). Accordingly, the Court dismisses without prejudice Corley's #1 petition for failure to comply with the Court's order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Court does not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 4/13/2022. (CBL)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 4. Order sent to party not electronically notified this date. Wed Apr 13 13:34:24 CDT 2022 (Long, Carol)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Accordingly, the Court orders the Clerk to mail Corley a copy of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Doc. 1. No later than March 31, 2022, Corley must sign the petition and return it to the Court. If Corley fails to timely comply with this Order, the Court may strike his petition under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 or dismiss the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 3/1/22. (Attachments: #1 Doc #1)(JAB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3. Mailed to party not set-up for electronic notification Tue Mar 1 12:13:30 CST 2022 (Bernsen, John)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Jerrod Corley. (JKL) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Jerrod Corley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JKL) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Feb 28 17:00:53 CST 2022 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Clark. (JKL) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Corley v. Blair | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jerrod Corley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Paul Blair | |
| Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
