Mackley v. Kirkhuff Management, Inc.
Amber Mackley |
Kirkhuff Management, Inc. |
4:2022cv00262 |
March 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Ronnie L White |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Kirkhuff Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stipulated Protective Order)(Gentzen, Margaret) |
Filing 21 Electronic Notice re #20 filed by Plaintiff Amber Mackley. Counsel are reminded that discovery documents are not accepted by the Court. See Rule 3.02 (FRCP 26) Filing of Discovery and Disclosure Materials:(A) In civil actions, discovery and disclosure materials pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, and 36, and the certificates of their service, shall not be filed with the Court except as exhibits to a motion or memorandum. (KCD) |
Filing 20 First MOTION for Disclosure Rule 26 by Plaintiff Amber Mackley. (Randazzo-Scott, Cierra) |
![]() |
Filing 18 [STRICKEN PER ORDER #19] Plaintiff's ANSWER to Complaint Affirmative Defenses by Amber Mackley.(Randazzo-Scott, Cierra) Modified on 4/19/2022 (KXS). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 15 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Amber Mackley. Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan. (Randazzo-Scott, Cierra) |
![]() |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by Kirkhuff Management, Inc..(Gentzen, Margaret) |
![]() |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Kirkhuff Management, Inc.. (Gentzen, Margaret) |
![]() |
Filing 9 Electronic Notice - Application for Admission needed as to Cierra Randazzo-Scott. Review of case shows that Attorney Cierra Randazzo-Scott is not currently a member of our Bar. For instructions on applying for bar admission or moving for pro hac vice admission, please follow the instructions located on our website at #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov under the Attorney tab. Notice only, no.pdf attached. (JKL) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Kirkhuff Management, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Gentzen, Margaret) Modified on 3/3/2022 to correct filing event type (JKL). |
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, State Court Docket Sheets by Defendant Kirkhuff Management, Inc.. (Gentzen, Margaret) Modified on 3/3/2022 to correct docket text(JKL). |
Filing 6 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney ;attorney/firm J. Clayton Schaeffer by Plaintiff Amber Mackley. (Schaeffer, John) |
Filing 5 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Amber Mackley.(JKL) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Kirkhuff Management, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Gentzen, Margaret) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Margaret D. Gentzen for Defendant Kirkhuff Management, Inc.. (Gentzen, Margaret) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas J. Smith for Defendant Kirkhuff Management, Inc.. (Smith, Thomas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County, case number 21SL-CC02088, with receipt number AMOEDC-9161422, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Kirkhuff Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Gentzen, Margaret) Modified on 3/3/2022 to correct event type(JKL). |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. (JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.