Morris-Hubbard v. Turnbull et al
Plaintiff: Loretta M. Morris-Hubbard
Defendant: Kent Turnbull and Logan Agri Service, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv00393
Filed: April 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Nannette A Baker
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand is GRANTED. (Doc. #15 ) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 5/13/2022. (JEB)
May 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [Doc. 15] no later than May 12, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on May 4, 2022. (JMR)
May 3, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court to City of St. Louis Circuit Court by Plaintiff Loretta M. Morris-Hubbard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Affidavit of Plaintiff)(Reinoehl, Rusty)
April 25, 2022 Filing 14 FULL CONSENT has been received. (JEB)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE (See Full Order) This case is assigned to Track: 2Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 4/25/2022. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 5/9/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 5/16/2022 10:00 AM in Zoom Video Conference before Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 4/12/2022. (JEB)
April 11, 2022 Filing 12 Defendant Logan Agri Service, Inc's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Logan Agri Service, Inc..(Davis, Joshua)
April 11, 2022 Filing 11 Defendant Kent Turnbull's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Kent Turnbull.(Davis, Joshua)
April 5, 2022 Filing 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
April 5, 2022 Filing 9 Consent to Removal by Defendant Kent Turnbull. (Kammerer, Thomas)
April 5, 2022 Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Zachary Thomas Faires for Defendant Kent Turnbull. (Faires, Zachary)
April 5, 2022 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas Andrew Kammerer for Defendant Kent Turnbull. (Kammerer, Thomas)
April 5, 2022 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Joshua S. Davis for Defendant Kent Turnbull. (Davis, Joshua)
April 5, 2022 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Kent Turnbull. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Kammerer, Thomas)
April 5, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Kent Turnbull To State Court Sent To: State Court - Executed (Kammerer, Thomas)
April 5, 2022 Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, City of St Louis, filed by Loretta M. Morris-Hubbard.(BAK)
April 5, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). (BAK)
April 5, 2022 Judge Baker enters a Standing Order in all of her cases as follows: See Order for details #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/judge/nannette-baker (HMA)
April 4, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Kent Turnbull Sent To: Plaintiff (Kammerer, Thomas)
April 4, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis City, case number 2122-CC01058, with receipt number AMOEDC-9220150, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Kent Turnbull. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Kammerer, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris-Hubbard v. Turnbull et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Loretta M. Morris-Hubbard
Represented By: Rusty K. Reinoehl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kent Turnbull
Represented By: Thomas Andrew Kammerer
Represented By: Joshua S. Davis
Represented By: Zachary Thomas Faires
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Logan Agri Service, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua S. Davis
Represented By: Thomas Andrew Kammerer
Represented By: Zachary Thomas Faires
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?