Walsh v. Lonigro
| Martin J. Walsh |
| Larry Lonigro |
| 4:2022cv00420 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Catherine D Perry |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
1st AMENDED CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT is SO ORDERED. See judgment for full details. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 05/11/2022. (ANP)
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL re #7 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Plaintiff Martin J. Walsh. (Hutchison, Jessica-Marie) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Plaintiff Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Hutchison, Jessica-Marie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Service: by Plaintiff Martin J. Walsh (Hutchison, Jessica-Marie) |
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order upon defendant Larry Lonigro at 14105 AirlineAvenue, Unit 2, Urbandale, IA 50323-2571. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall serve defendant with a copy of its complaint and motion to approve consent judgment by mail and file a corrected certificate of service and supplemental information required by this Memorandum and Order by no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order or the motion to approve consent judgment will be denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/19/2022. [A COPY OF THIS ORDER MAILED TO DEFENDANT THIS DATE](KEK)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Plaintiff Martin J. Walsh re #2 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment , #3 Supplemental (Hutchison, Jessica-Marie) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL re #2 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Plaintiff Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A)(Hutchison, Jessica-Marie) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Plaintiff Martin J. Walsh. (Hutchison, Jessica-Marie) |
| ***REMARK Attorney for plaintiff contacted by email on 4/11/2022 at 3:17pm and 4:06pm as well as by phone on 4/12/2022 at 11:08am. Attorney directed to file service documents. No service documents have been filed at this time. Case to proceed to Judge assignment. (JKL) Modified on 4/12/2022 to correct docket text(JKL). |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. (JKL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Non-Jury Demand,, filed by U.S. Department of Labor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form)(Hutchison, Jessica-Marie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walsh v. Lonigro | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Martin J. Walsh | |
| Represented By: | Jessica-Marie Hutchison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Larry Lonigro | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
