FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
| FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc. |
| Apple, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00429 |
| April 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Catherine D Perry |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #15 MOTION to Dismiss #1 :Complaint for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Webb, B.) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss #1 :Complaint for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Webb, B.) |
| Filing 14 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Catherine D. Perry for all further proceedings. (TMT) |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Apple, Inc... (Webb, B.) |
| Filing 12 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Apple, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). (Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 5/20/2022.) (TMT) |
Filing 11
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (ECF No. #10 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file the answer on or before June 9, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 5/9/2022. (ESD)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Webb, B.) |
| Filing 9 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Apple, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). (Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 5/6/2022.) (TMT) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc.. Apple, Inc. served on 4/19/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 7 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Apple, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). (Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 4/25/2022.) (TMT) |
| Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 5 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding patent. (BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Anthony G. Simon. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). (BAK) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Paul Tahan for Plaintiff FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc.. (Tahan, Paul) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc. Process Server: Mark Smith (Simon, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Apple, Inc. with receipt number AMOEDC-9239108, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - U.S. Patent No. 11,042,623, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Summons)(Simon, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Paul Tahan |
| Represented By: | Anthony G. Simon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apple, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | B. Trent Webb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
