KraftPowercon, Inc. v. Scienco/Fast, Inc.
| KraftPowercon, Inc. |
| Scienco/Fast, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00434 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff KraftPowercon, Inc.. . (Casimer, Gregory) |
Filing 15
Docket Text ORDER Re: #14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Gregory Casimer by Plaintiff KraftPowercon, Inc.; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 6/13/2022. (TMT)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Gregory Casimer. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9341804) by Plaintiff KraftPowercon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Casimer, Gregory) |
|
Filing 13
RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: two Joint Scheduling Plan due by 6/13/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 6/15/2022 01:00 PM in Zoom Video Conference before District Judge Matthew T. Schelp. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 05/25/2022. (KCD)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Scienco/Fast, Inc..(Sanders, Dan) |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Scienco/Fast, Inc.. Parent companies: BioMicrobics, Inc., Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Sanders, Dan) |
| Filing 10 Electronic Notice of Noncompliance - Review of this case shows the Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate has not been filed by Defendant Scienco/Fast, Inc.. The certificate must be filed with the Court within 5 days # (moed-0001.pdf). (Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 5/11/2022.) (TMT) |
|
Filing 9
Docket Text ORDER Re: #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Scienco/Fast, Inc; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 06/05/2022. (KCD)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Scienco/Fast, Inc.. (Sanders, Dan) |
|
Filing 7
Docket Text ORDER Re: #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Dan Crane Sanders. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9276473) by Defendant Scienco/Fast, Inc; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 05/05/2022. (KCD)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Dan Crane Sanders. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9276473) by Defendant Scienco/Fast, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Sanders, Dan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by KraftPowercon, Inc.. Scienco/Fast, Inc. served on 4/19/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. (Twait, Danielle) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/25/2022: #1 Summons) (BRP). |
| Filing 4 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Scienco/Fast, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). (Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 4/25/2022.) (TMT) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff KraftPowercon, Inc. Process Server: It's Your Serve c/o Jeffrey Daniel (Twait, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff KraftPowercon, Inc.. Parent companies: KraftPowercon Sweden AB,. (Twait, Danielle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Scienco/Fast, Inc. with receipt number AMOEDC-9240931, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by KraftPowercon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Original Filing Form, #6 Summons)(Twait, Danielle) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Matthew T. Schelp. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Danielle N. Twait. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KraftPowercon, Inc. v. Scienco/Fast, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KraftPowercon, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Danielle N. Twait |
| Represented By: | Gregory Peter Casimer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scienco/Fast, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Dan Crane Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
