Walker v. Best Buy Inc.
Plaintiff: Andrew Walker, Jr.
Defendant: Best Buy Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv00447
Filed: April 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Henry Edward Autrey
Referring Judge: David D Noce
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Letter to Andrew Walker, Jr. from the court re: Discovery (Attachments: #1 Attachment Discovery) (JEB)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge David D. Noce termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Henry Edward Autrey for all further proceedings. (CLT)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8. Fri May 27 15:12:58 CDT 2022 (Thoele, Cassandra)
May 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Best Buy Inc.. (Boggs, Beth)
May 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendant Best Buy Inc.. (Boggs, Beth)
May 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Beth C. Boggs for Defendant Best Buy Inc.. (Boggs, Beth)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable David D. Noce. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Apr 19 10:01:15 CDT 2022 (admin,)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Andrew Walker, Jr. (JWD)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Andrew Walker, Jr. (JWD)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Best Buy Inc., Jury Demand, filed by Andrew Walker, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Envelope)(JWD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Best Buy Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Walker, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Best Buy Inc.
Represented By: Beth C. Boggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?