Lagrone v. Transunion, LLC. et al
Endya Lagrone |
Transunion, LLC. and Together Credit Union |
4:2022cv00487 |
May 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Sarah E Pitlyk |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Docket Text ORDER: re #13 NOTICE of Settlement as to TransUnion LLC by Endya Lagrone (Saks, Yaakov) ; SO ORDERED. Parties to file a stipulation of dismissal as to defendant TransUnion, LLC within 60 days of today's date. (Dismissal Paper(s) due by 8/23/2022.) Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 06/24/2022. (ANP) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement as to TransUnion LLC by Endya Lagrone (Saks, Yaakov) |
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CONFERENCE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: This case is assigned to Track 2. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 8/15/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 8/25/2022 01:00 PM in Zoom Video Conference before District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS] Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 6/14/2022. (KEK) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Endya Lagrone. Together Credit Union served on 5/6/2022, answer due 5/27/2022. (Saks, Yaakov) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, And Affirmative Defenses by Transunion, LLC..(Huse, William) |
Filing 9 ENTRY of Appearance by Thomas M. Martin for Defendant Together Credit Union. (Martin, Thomas) |
Filing 8 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Together Credit Union. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Lewis, Ashlyn) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Together Credit Union.(Lewis, Ashlyn) |
Filing 6 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice William M. Huse. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9289276) by Defendant Transunion, LLC. (Huse, William); ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk on 05/13/2022. (KRZ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice William M. Huse. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9289276) by Defendant Transunion, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Huse, William) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Transunion, LLC.. Parent companies: Transunion and Trans Union Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Subsidiaries: T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,. (Schuckit, Robert) |
Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert J. Schuckit for Defendant Transunion, LLC.. (Schuckit, Robert) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Endya Lagrone Process Server: Guaranteed Subpoena Service, Inc. (Saks, Yaakov) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Together Credit Union, Transunion, LLC. with receipt number AMOEDC-9268244, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Endya Lagrone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons together credit, #3 Summons tu, #4 Original Filing Form)(Saks, Yaakov) (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/2/2022 due to bad PDF) (JWD). Modified on 5/2/2022 (JWD). |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk. 2 Summons(es) issued and emailed to attorney Yaakov Saks. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.