Fondren v. Saul et al
Plaintiff: Corey Fondren
Defendant: A. Saul, M. White and J. Mason
Case Number: 4:2022cv00599
Filed: June 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
Presiding Judge: Noelle C Collins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2022 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Corey Fondren. (BRP)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/9/2022. (TMT)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants are DISMISSED. An Order of Dismissal will accompany this memorandum and order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/9/2022. (TMT)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3, 4. Thu Jun 9 09:31:34 CDT 2022 (Tillman, Tiffani)
June 3, 2022 Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
June 3, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JBH)
June 3, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JBH)
June 3, 2022 ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Jun 3 12:00:52 CDT 2022 (admin,)
June 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Corey Fondren. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(JBH) Modified on 6/3/2022 to correct file date.(JBH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fondren v. Saul et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corey Fondren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Mason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?