Lane v. USA
Petitioner: Johnnie Lane
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2022cv00677
Filed: June 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Henry Edward Autrey
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #4 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion for Extension Of Time To Respond by Respondent USA. ORDERED: ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED UP TO AND INCLUDING OCTOBER 3, 2022. (Show Cause Response due by 10/3/2022.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/17/2022. (CBL)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Docket Text ORDER: Re: #3 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Respondent USA. ORDERED: DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/17/2022. (CBL)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion for Extension Of Time To Respond by Respondent USA. (Lang, Colleen)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5, 6. Orders sent to party not electronically notified this date. Wed Aug 17 12:51:01 CDT 2022 (Long, Carol)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Respondent USA. (Lang, Colleen)
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 2. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Wed Jul 6 09:07:06 CDT 2022 (Aubuchon, Heather)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case has been assigned to Track 4 (Administrative). Respondent must show cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant motion to vacate should not be granted. (Show Cause Response due by 8/19/2022.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/5/2022. (HMA)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DJO)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (DJO)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jun 28 10:00:54 CDT 2022 (admin,)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY by Petitioner Johnnie Lane. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lane v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Johnnie Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Colleen C. Lang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?