National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al v. MS Contracting LLC
National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Amtrak |
MS Contracting LLC |
4:2022cv00694 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled case is transferred to the Northern Division and assigned to the Honorable Nannette A. Baker, United States Magistrate Judge, under cause number 2:22-cv-00037-NAB. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that cause number 4:22-cv-00694-UNA be administratively closed. (JDC) |
Filing 3 NOTICE Original Filing Form: by Plaintiffs BNSF Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak re #1 Complaint, (Hamer, Sean) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs BNSF Railway Company, National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak Process Server: HPS Process Service and Investigations (Hamer, Sean) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant MS Contracting LLC with receipt number AMOEDC-9377128, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons to MS Contracting)(Hamer, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.