William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP v. Ashtel Studios, Inc.
Plaintiff: BPP and William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP
Defendant: Ashtel Studios, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv00802
Filed: August 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Ronnie L White
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2022 Filing 29 NOTICE Service of Initial Disclosures: by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc. (Ketchum, Amanda)
September 20, 2022 Filing 28 RESPONSE in Opposition re #27 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit May 2022 Fax from Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. v. Ashtel, #2 Text of Proposed Order Plaintiff's proposed version of protective order)(Eisenberg, Ronald)
September 19, 2022 Filing 27 MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Protective Order)(Ketchum, Amanda)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: two Motion to Join Parties due by 12/19/2022. Discovery Completion due by 5/26/2023. Non-Dispositive Motions due by 6/9/2023. ADR Future Reference 12/1/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 5/15/2023. Jury Trial set for 1/16/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10S - St. Louis before District Judge Ronnie L. White. Pretrial Compliance due by 12/27/2023. Motion in Limine due by 12/27/2023. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 09/08/2022. (KCD)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Rule 16 Telephone Conference previously scheduled for September 15, 2022, at 1:30 p.m., is CANCELED. The Court will issue a case management order based upon the parties Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/8/22. (JEB)
September 8, 2022 Filing 24 ANSWER to #20 Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Ashtel Studios, Inc..(Ketchum, Amanda)
September 7, 2022 Filing 23 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP. and Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Eisenberg, Ronald)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Docket Text ORDER: Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint on August 22, 2022. To date, Defendant has not filed a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). Defendant shall file any responsive pleading no later than September 9, 2022, or to the Court shall issue a show cause order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/7/22. (JEB)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: two Joint Scheduling Plan due by 9/8/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 9/15/2022 01:30 PM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Ronnie L. White. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 08/24/2022. (KCD)
August 22, 2022 Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc. , filed by BPP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Horwitz, Philip)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall identify its real name in an Amended Complaint no later than Tuesday, August 23, 2022. Failure to do so will result in the Court dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to follow this Courts Orders. ( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 8/23/2022.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 08/17/2022. (KCD)
August 16, 2022 Filing 18 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Ronnie L. White for all further proceedings (KEK)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counsel for the defendant must file their Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form by 8/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 8/16/2022. (KEK)
August 15, 2022 Filing 16 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Ketchum, Amanda)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Sridavi Ganesan (Doc. #13 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 8/5/22. (SGP)
August 5, 2022 Filing 14 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Ketchum, Amanda)
August 4, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Sridavi Ganesan. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9436189) by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing California State Bar - Certificate of Good Standing for Sridavi Ganesan)(Ganesan, Sridavi)
August 4, 2022 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Ashtel Studios, Inc..(Ketchum, Amanda) (Main Document 12 replaced on 8/5/2022) (ANP).
August 4, 2022 Filing 11 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 8/14/2022. (ANP)
August 3, 2022 Notice from Clerk instructing Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc. to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 8/13/2022. (ANP)
August 2, 2022 Filing 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
August 2, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment, #3 Exhibit, #4 Original Filing Form)(Ketchum, Amanda)
August 2, 2022 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, Original Filling Form by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Ketchum, Amanda)
August 2, 2022 Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). (JDC)
August 1, 2022 Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael J. Judy for Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Judy, Michael)
August 1, 2022 Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert Schultz for Plaintiff BPP. (Schultz, Robert)
August 1, 2022 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff BPP. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Eisenberg, Ronald)
August 1, 2022 Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by BPP.(JDC)
August 1, 2022 Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (JDC)
August 1, 2022 Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Ronald J. Eisenberg for Plaintiff BPP. (Eisenberg, Ronald)
August 1, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 21st Circuit - County of St. Louis, case number 22SL-CC02900, with receipt number AMOEDC-9427993, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ketchum, Amanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP v. Ashtel Studios, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BPP
Represented By: Philip M. Horwitz
Represented By: Robert Schultz
Represented By: Ronald J. Eisenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP
Represented By: Philip M. Horwitz
Represented By: Robert Schultz
Represented By: Ronald J. Eisenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashtel Studios, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Pennington Ketchum
Represented By: Michael J. Judy
Represented By: Sridavi Ganesan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?