William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP v. Ashtel Studios, Inc.
BPP and William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP |
Ashtel Studios, Inc. |
4:2022cv00802 |
August 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Ronnie L White |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 NOTICE Service of Initial Disclosures: by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc. (Ketchum, Amanda) |
Filing 28 RESPONSE in Opposition re #27 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit May 2022 Fax from Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. v. Ashtel, #2 Text of Proposed Order Plaintiff's proposed version of protective order)(Eisenberg, Ronald) |
Filing 27 MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Protective Order)(Ketchum, Amanda) |
Filing 26 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER This case is assigned to Track: two Motion to Join Parties due by 12/19/2022. Discovery Completion due by 5/26/2023. Non-Dispositive Motions due by 6/9/2023. ADR Future Reference 12/1/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 5/15/2023. Jury Trial set for 1/16/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10S - St. Louis before District Judge Ronnie L. White. Pretrial Compliance due by 12/27/2023. Motion in Limine due by 12/27/2023. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 09/08/2022. (KCD) |
Filing 25 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Rule 16 Telephone Conference previously scheduled for September 15, 2022, at 1:30 p.m., is CANCELED. The Court will issue a case management order based upon the parties Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/8/22. (JEB) |
Filing 24 ANSWER to #20 Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Ashtel Studios, Inc..(Ketchum, Amanda) |
Filing 23 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff William M. Cohen, D.M.D., M.S., Greater St. Louis Periodontics, P.C. d/b/a BPP. and Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Eisenberg, Ronald) |
Filing 22 Docket Text ORDER: Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint on August 22, 2022. To date, Defendant has not filed a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). Defendant shall file any responsive pleading no later than September 9, 2022, or to the Court shall issue a show cause order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/7/22. (JEB) |
Filing 21 RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: two Joint Scheduling Plan due by 9/8/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 9/15/2022 01:30 PM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before District Judge Ronnie L. White. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 08/24/2022. (KCD) |
Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc. , filed by BPP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Horwitz, Philip) |
Filing 19 ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall identify its real name in an Amended Complaint no later than Tuesday, August 23, 2022. Failure to do so will result in the Court dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to follow this Courts Orders. ( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 8/23/2022.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 08/17/2022. (KCD) |
Filing 18 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Ronnie L. White for all further proceedings (KEK) |
Filing 17 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counsel for the defendant must file their Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form by 8/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 8/16/2022. (KEK) |
Filing 16 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Ketchum, Amanda) |
Filing 15 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Sridavi Ganesan (Doc. #13 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 8/5/22. (SGP) |
Filing 14 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Ketchum, Amanda) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Sridavi Ganesan. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-9436189) by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing California State Bar - Certificate of Good Standing for Sridavi Ganesan)(Ganesan, Sridavi) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Ashtel Studios, Inc..(Ketchum, Amanda) (Main Document 12 replaced on 8/5/2022) (ANP). |
Filing 11 Electronic Notice re: Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate to Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every non-governmental organizational party must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within ten (10) days of the party's first pleading or entry of appearance. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible # (moed-0001.pdf). Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 8/14/2022. (ANP) |
Notice from Clerk instructing Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc. to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 8/13/2022. (ANP) |
Filing 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment, #3 Exhibit, #4 Original Filing Form)(Ketchum, Amanda) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, Original Filling Form by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Ketchum, Amanda) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John M. Bodenhausen. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. and all non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). (JDC) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael J. Judy for Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Judy, Michael) |
Filing 6 ENTRY of Appearance by Robert Schultz for Plaintiff BPP. (Schultz, Robert) |
Filing 5 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff BPP. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Eisenberg, Ronald) |
Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, filed by BPP.(JDC) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL State Court Docket Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal Petition, by Defendant Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (JDC) |
Filing 2 ENTRY of Appearance by Ronald J. Eisenberg for Plaintiff BPP. (Eisenberg, Ronald) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 21st Circuit - County of St. Louis, case number 22SL-CC02900, with receipt number AMOEDC-9427993, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Ashtel Studios, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ketchum, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.