Hassan v. Blome et al
| Muhammad Haseeb Hassan |
| Donald Blome and Antony Blinken |
| 4:2022cv00803 |
| August 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Catherine D Perry |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Docket Text ORDER: re #3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Muhammad Haseeb Hassan (Goldstein, Joshua) ; Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 09/29/2022. (ANP)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Muhammad Haseeb Hassan (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Muhammad Haseeb Hassan. Defendant Antony Blinken served on 8/9/2022, answer due 10/11/2022; Donald Blome served on 8/9/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-9430273, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Muhammad Haseeb Hassan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Catherine D. Perry. 4 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Attorney Joshua Goldstein. (JDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
