Blackmon v. Missouri Veterans Commission
| Shavette Blackmon |
| Missouri Veterans Commission |
| 4:2022cv00932 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| John A Ross |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 2. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule shall apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS.) (Motion to Join Parties due by 1/17/2023. Discovery Completion due by 5/1/2023. ADR Future Reference 5/1/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 5/30/2023. Jury Trial set for 1/16/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 12N - St. Louis before District Judge John A. Ross. Pretrial Conference set for 1/11/2024 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12N - St. Louis before District Judge John A. Ross. Pretrial Compliance due by 12/28/2023. Motion in Limine due by 1/2/2024.) Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/29/2022. (LNJ)
|
| Filing 7 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Shavette Blackmon. . (Kleefuss, Bret) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING PLAN: This case is assigned to Preliminary Track: 2. No later than October 6, 2022, counsel shall file with the Clerk of the Court a joint proposed scheduling plan. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS.) (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 10/6/2022.) Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/7/2022. (LNJ)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Missouri Veterans Commission.(Walsh, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Katherine S. Walsh for Defendant Missouri Veterans Commission. (Walsh, Katherine) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Missouri Veterans Commission Sent To: Plaintiff (JDC) |
| Filing 2 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, filed by Shavette Blackmon.(JDC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from City of St. Louis, case number 2222-CC09093, with receipt number AMOEDC-9490413, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Missouri Veterans Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Circuit Court Legal File, #2 Exhibit B - Circuit Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Original Filing Form, #4 Exhibit D - Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Notice to Parties of Notice of Removal)(Walsh, Katherine) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable John A. Ross. (JDC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blackmon v. Missouri Veterans Commission | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shavette Blackmon | |
| Represented By: | Bret C. Kleefuss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Missouri Veterans Commission | |
| Represented By: | Katherine S. Walsh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
