Scott et al v. Ford Motor Company
| Patricia S Scott, Patricia S. Scott and Wallace Scott |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 4:2022cv00968 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Stephen R Welby |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Docket Text ORDER: The Court notes that the parties were to "meet and confer, then notify the Court by January 27, 2023, concerning whether they wish to request an order for an early neutral evaluation or mediation." Doc. 23 at p. 2. Not having received a filing from parties, the Court concludes that the parties do not seek an order for early neutral evaluation or mediation. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 2/6/23. (JAB) |
| Filing 24 AMENDED ANSWER to Plaintiff's Petition amended form filer filed by Ford Motor Company filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Rozell, Sherry) |
Filing 23
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 3 (Complex). Pursuant to the Civil Justice Reform Act Expense and Delay Reduction Plan and the Differentiated Case Management Program of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Missouri, and the Rule 16 Conference held on November 9, 2022. The Court orders that the following schedule applies in this case, and that this schedule will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS.) (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 11/30/2022., Motion in Limine due by 10/1/2024., Pretrial Compliance due by 9/26/2024., Response to Court due by 1/27/2023., Motion to Join Parties due by 1/27/2023. Discovery Completion due by 5/1/2024. ADR Future Reference 3/1/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 6/14/2024. Jury Trial set for 10/15/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 14N - St. Louis before District Judge Stephen R. Clark. Pretrial Conference set for 10/7/2024 01:30 PM in Courtroom 14N - St. Louis before District Judge Stephen R. Clark.) Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 11/10/2022. (LNJ)
|
| Filing 22 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before District Judge Stephen R. Clark:Rule 16 Conference held on 11/9/2022. Conference held via Zoom Teleconference. CMO to issue. (Notice only, no.pdf attached.). (proceedings started: 4:42 pm) (proceedings ended: 5:28 pm) (Appearance for Plaintiff: Bernard McDonnell)(Appearance for Defendant: Sherry A. Rozell) (LNJ) |
| Filing 21 ENTRY of Appearance by Sherry A. Rozell for Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Rozell, Sherry) |
|
Filing 20
Docket Text ORDER: The Court grants Defendant Ford Motor Company's #18 Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference. On November 9, 2022 at 4:30 p.m., the Court will hold a Rule 16 conference by Zoom. Conference participants will receive an email with a link to access the conference. Lead trial counsel must participate in the conference. ( Rule 16 Conference set for 11/9/2022 04:30 PM in Zoom Video Conference before District Judge Stephen R. Clark.) Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/19/2022. (CLT)
|
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #18 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rozell, Sherry) |
| Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Rozell, Sherry) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Plaintiff Patricia S. Scott filed by Plaintiff Patricia S. Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defense Counsel regarding Magistrate Acceptance dated September 22, 2022, #2 Exhibit Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel dated October 5, 2022 at 7:50 a.m.at to Defense Counsel regarding filing of Proposed Scheduling Order dated, #3 Exhibit Spam Email from Defense Counsel to Plaintiffs' Counsel dated October 3, 2022 at 4:25 p.m., #4 Exhibit Spam Email from Defense Counsel to Plaintiffs' Counsel dated October 4, 2022 at 2:34 p.m., #5 Exhibit Spam Email from paralegal at Defense Counsel's office to Plaintiffs' Counsel dated October 4, 2022 at 4:57 p.m. regarding non-consent for Magistrate, #6 Exhibit Spam Email from Defense Counsel to Plaintiffs' Counsel dated October r 5, 2022 at 2:50 p.m., #7 Exhibit Spam Email from Defense Counsel to Plaintiffs' Counsel dated October 5, 2022 at 9:43 p.m.F)(McDonnell, Bernard) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #14 Order,, Response to Show Cause Order - Ford - 2022-10-12 by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1, #2 Exhibit Ex 2, #3 Exhibit Ex 3, #4 Exhibit Ex 4, #5 Exhibit Ex 5)(Rozell, Sherry) |
| Filing 15 JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Patricia S. Scott. . (McDonnell, Bernard) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: The court strikes #12 Plaintiff's Proposed Scheduling Plan and #13 Defendant's Proposed Scheduling Plan for failure to comply with #6 Rule 16 Order. No later than October 12, 2022, Counsel must actually speak and discuss items, as required by #6 Rule 16 Order. No later than October 17, 2022, Counsel must together submit a Joint Scheduling Plan and individually show cause why the Court should not sanction the parties for failure to comply with the Court's order. (Joint Scheduling Plan due by 10/17/2022. Show Cause Response due by 10/17/2022.) Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/6/2022. (LNJ)
|
| Filing 13 -- STRICKEN per entry #14 -- JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Ford Motor Company's Proposed Joint Scheduling Plan. (Rozell, Sherry) Modified on 10/6/2022 (LNJ). |
| Filing 12 -- STRICKEN per entry #14 -- JOINT SCHEDULING PLAN by Plaintiff Patricia S. Scott. . (McDonnell, Bernard) Modified on 10/6/2022 (LNJ). |
|
Filing 11
Docket Text ORDER: The Court continues the Rule 16 conference to October 25, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. by Zoom. Conference participants will receive an email with a link to access the conference. Lead trial counsel must participate in the conference. The parties' joint scheduling plan remains due October 5, 2022. (Rule 16 Conference set for 10/25/2022 04:00 PM in Zoom Video Conference before District Judge Stephen R. Clark.) Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 10/3/22. (JAB)
|
| Filing 10 CJRA ORDER (GJL). Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby termed. Case reassigned to District Judge Stephen R. Clark for all further proceedings (KJS) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC, Jiangling Motors Corporation, Limited, Ford Otomotiv Sanayi Anonim Sirketi (Ford Otosan), Rivian Automotive, Inc., Ford Credit Canada Company, Ford Credit de Mexico S.A.,, Sociedad Financiera de Objeto Multiple, E.R, Ford Holdings LLC, FCE Bank plc, Ford Automotive Finance (China) Limited.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Supplemental Disclosure of Organizational Interests_FORD)(Rozell, Sherry) Modified on 9/28/2022 (CBL). |
| Filing 8 Electronic Notice of Noncompliance as to Defendant Ford Motor Company. Review of this case shows your Disclosure of Organizational Interests was filed incorrectly. You must refile the disclosure and add all corporate parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and LLC members into the system. (Those from the supplement have not been filed through the system.) Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate due by 9/30/2022. (CBL) |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Ford Motor Company. No corporate parents or affiliates identified. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Supplemental Disclosure of Organizational Interests_FORD)(Rozell, Sherry) |
|
Filing 6
RULE 16 ORDER This case is assigned to Track: 2: STANDARD Joint Scheduling Plan due by 10/5/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 10/12/2022 02:00 PM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 10/5/2022.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen R. Welby on 9/22/22. (KJS)
|
| Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Ford Motor Company.(Rozell, Sherry) |
| Filing 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Filing 3 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, filed by Patricia S. Scott, Wallace Scott.(JDC) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Welby. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file a Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate within 10 days of the filing of the first pleading or entry of appearance # (moed-0001.pdf). (JDC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company Notice To Plaintiff of Filing Notice of Removal Sent To: Plaintiff (Rozell, Sherry) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 11th Circuit State of MO, case number 2211-CC00740, with receipt number AMOEDC-9508617, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Petition, #2 Exhibit Docket and Court File, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form)(Rozell, Sherry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
