Comstock v. Vandergriff
| John Comstock |
| Teri Vandergriff |
| 4:2022cv01009 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
***REMARK - Case transferred from Missouri Eastern has been opened in Western District of Missouri as case 6:22-cv-03268 (KXS)
|
|
***REMARK: Case transferred to Western District of Missouri on 10/13/2022. (HMA)
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF TRANSFER to: Western District of Missouri. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] is provisionally GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and subject to modification by the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. See 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). (Case to be transferred after 10/11/2022) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/27/2022. (JEB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5. Copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Tue Sep 27 12:58:16 CDT 2022 (Bailey, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 4
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner John Comstock. (JWD)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner John Comstock. (JWD)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner John Comstock. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Correspondence, #5 Envelope)(JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Sep 23 16:01:29 CDT 2022 (admin,)
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Nannette A. Baker. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Comstock v. Vandergriff | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Comstock | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Teri Vandergriff | |
| Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
